U.S. v. Peppe, No. 95-2121 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 19) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
Loaded on May 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
May 06, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Ability to Pay.
The defendant challenged the imposition of a $10,000 fine on the grounds of his current inability to pay the fine and the likelihood that he would not be able to pay it in the future. In rejecting that claim, the First Circuit reviews the language of U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(d) …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Palomo, No. 94-20953 (5th Cir.) (80 F.3d 138) (March 28, 1996) (Judge James L. Dennis)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 94-6463 (10th Cir.) (80 F.3d 436) (April 4, 1996) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. McGuire, No. 94-60648 (5th Cir.) (79 F.3d 1396) (March 26, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Morin, No. 95-5242 (4th Cir.) (80 F.3d 124) (April 5, 1996) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 93-3089 (D.C. Cir.) (79 F.3d 1193) (March 29, 1996) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Burke, No. 95-2675 (8th Cir.) (80 F.3d 314) (April 8, 1996) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Doe, No. 95-1470, No. 992 (2nd Cir.) (79 F.3d 1309) (March 22, 1996) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Rios-Calderon, No. 93-1583 (7th Cir.) (80 F.3d 194) (March 19, 1996) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. McGuire, No. 94-60648 (5th Cir.) (79 F.3d 1396) (March 26, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 94-6463 (10th Cir.) (80 F.3d 436) (April 4, 1996) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Thompson, No. 95-30210 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 368) (April 3, 1996) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Dunn, No. 95-30172 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 402) (April 9, 1996) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Lilly, No. 95-2191 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 24) (April 3, 1996) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Brown, No. 93-4063 (11th Cir.) (79 F.3d 1550) (April 16, 1996) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 93-3089 (D.C. Cir.) (79 F.3d 1193) (March 29, 1996) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Hill, No. 95-5246 (6th Cir.) (79 F.3d 1477) (March 28, 1996) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Mindel, No. 94-50562 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 394) (April 5, 1996) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
- U.S. v. Klausner, No. 95-1451, No. 862 (2nd Cir.) (80 F.3d 55) (March 27, 1996) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- U.S. v. DeMaria, No. 95-855-CR (S.D.Fla.) (919 F.Supp. 429) (February 15, 1996) (Judge K. Michael Moore)
- U.S. v. Levine, No. 94-50588 (5th Cir.) (80 F.3d 129) (March 28, 1996) (Judge James L. Dennis)
- U.S. v. Burke, No. 95-2675 (8th Cir.) (80 F.3d 314) (April 8, 1996) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Magana-Guerrero, No. 95-50066 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 398) (April 8, 1996) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Peppe, No. 95-2121 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 19) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
- U.S. v. Rios-Calderon, No. 93-1583 (7th Cir.) (80 F.3d 194) (March 19, 1996) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Doe, No. 95-1470, No. 992 (2nd Cir.) (79 F.3d 1309) (March 22, 1996) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Hatney, No. 94-9155 (11th Cir.) (80 F.3d 458) (April 15, 1996) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Lilly, No. 95-2191 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 24) (April 3, 1996) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Mauro, No. 95-1025 (2nd Cir.) (80 F.3d 73) (April 2, 1996) (Judge J. Edward Lumbard)
- U.S. v. Wilhelm, No. 94-5764 (4th Cir.) (80 F.3d 116) (April 3, 1996) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin)
- U.S. v. Peppe, No. 95-2121 (1st Cir.) (80 F.3d 19) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
- U.S. v. Flanagan, No. 95-20468 (5th Cir.) (80 F.3d 143) (March 29, 1996) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- U.S. v. Magana-Guerrero, No. 95-50066 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 398) (April 8, 1996) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
More from these topics:
- South Dakota Sobriety Program Participants Will No Longer Be Jailed for Non-Payment of Fees, March 1, 2026. Settlements, Class Certification, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Unlawful Detention, Ability to Pay.
- California Supreme Court Announces Excessive Fines Clauses Are the Proper Method to Challenge Punitive Fines, Holds Equal Protection Requires Courts to Consider Defendant’s Inability to Pay Before Imposing Certain Ancillary Assessments Upon Request, Feb. 1, 2026. Constitution, U.S., Constitution, state, Equal Protection Clause/Claims, Fines, Ability to Pay.
- Report on “Pay-to-Stay” Fees Makes Strong Case for Their Repeal, Jan. 1, 2026. Racial Discrimination, Medical Expenses, Cost of Prison Systems, housing, Ability to Pay.
- Kentucky Supreme Court Voids Prisoner’s $10,972 Jail Fee, July 15, 2025. Booking Fees, Supervision Fee, Ability to Pay.
- Florida’s “Pay to Stay” Law: A Second Sentence for Former Prisoners, May 1, 2025. Ability to Pay.
- Medical Copays Blamed for Reducing Prisoner Access to Healthcare, May 1, 2025. Medical Misconduct, Medical Expenses, Ability to Pay.
- Missouri Repeals “Pay-to-Stay” Law, May 1, 2025. Cost of Prison Systems, Costs, Ability to Pay.
- Fines and Fees Destroy the Impoverished and Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, Jan. 15, 2025. Effects of Mass Incarceration, Ability to Pay.
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Corizon Executes “Texas Two-Step,” Spinning Off Debt Into Bankrupt New Firm to Avoid Paying Creditors and Lawsuit Winners, Aug. 15, 2023. Corizon, Settlements, Ability to Pay.