U.S. v. Forte, No. 95-3076 (D.C. Cir.) (81 F.3d 215) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
Case suggests that lying about relevant conduct (as opposed to the offense of conviction) may not always be an absolute bar to an acceptance of responsibility sentence adjustment under USSG § 3E1.1.
In this case, Judge Williams discusses, very briefly, whether lying about a defendant's relevant conduct (as opposed to ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login