U.S. v. Lang, No. 95-3260 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 955) (April 12, 1996) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
Case held that when a § 924(c) conviction is reversed on sufficiency of evidence grounds, the case is subject to remand to determine the applicability of the enhancement under USSG § 2D1.1(b)(1).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Wang v. Reno, No. 93-17262 (9th Cir.) (81 F.3d 808) (April 12, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 94-3123 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 915) (February 7, 1996) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- Faulder v. Johnson, No. 95-40512 (5th Cir.) (81 F.3d 515) (April 10, 1996) (Judge John M. Jr. Duhé)
- U.S. v. Reed, No. 95-10118 (9th Cir.) (80 F.3d 1419) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Forte, No. 95-3076 (D.C. Cir.) (81 F.3d 215) (April 16, 1996) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 95-8053 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 945) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Blake, No. 95-5273 (4th Cir.) (81 F.3d 498) (April 18, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Tedder, No. 95-10325 (5th Cir.) (81 F.3d 549) (April 15, 1996) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 95-8053 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 945) (April 11, 1996) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Lang, No. 95-3260 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 955) (April 12, 1996) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Lang, No. 95-3260 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 955) (April 12, 1996) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Medina-Estrada, No. 95-4150 (10th Cir.) (81 F.3d 981) (April 16, 1996) (Judge James E. Barrett)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.