Skip navigation

Humphrey v. Cain, No. 95-31101 (5th Cir.) (120 F.3d 526) (August 14, 1997) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)

Case contains a detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's current jurisprudence concerning jury instructions that improperly define the meaning of "reasonable doubt.".

Once again a Court of Appeals has attempted to make sense out of the Supreme Court's jurisprudence about instructions to the jury which incorrectly define the concept of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login