Skip navigation

Humphrey v. Cain, No. 95-31101 (5th Cir.) (120 F.3d 526) (August 14, 1997) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)

Case contains a detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's current jurisprudence concerning jury instructions that improperly define the meaning of "reasonable doubt.".

Once again a Court of Appeals has attempted to make sense out of the Supreme Court's jurisprudence about instructions to the jury which incorrectly define the concept of …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login