U.S. v. Monem, No. 97-1220 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 645) (July 24, 1997) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
September 22, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Ability to Pay.
Court held that district court was not required to identify specific assets from which defendant could pay fine because of defendant's use of a false social security card and a demonstrated willingness to conceal assets.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Monem, No. 97-1220 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 645) (July 24, 1997) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- Humphrey v. Cain, No. 95-31101 (5th Cir.) (120 F.3d 526) (August 14, 1997) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- Beverati v. Smith, No. 96-7520 (4th Cir.) (120 F.3d 500) (August 11, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Kemmish, No. 96-50241 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 937) (July 15, 1997) (Judge Edward Leavy)
- U.S. v. Muhammad, No. 96-2434 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 688) (July 21, 1997) (Judge John L. Jr. Kane)
- U.S. v. Shumard, No. 96-1698 (2nd Cir.) (120 F.3d 339) (May 30, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Beydler, No. 96-30035 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 985) (July 22, 1997) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- U.S. v. Pierre, No. 96-4187 (11th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1153) (August 28, 1997) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- Burtch v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, No. 96-35066 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1087) (August 15, 1997) (Judge J. Clifford Wallace)
- U.S. v. Igbonwa, No. 96-1848 (3rd Cir.) (120 F.3d 437) (August 7, 1997) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Tirrell, No. 96-2752 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 670) (July 15, 1997) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- Denton v. Hernandez, No. 95-5903 (4th Cir.) (120 F.3d 464) (July 23, 1997) (Judge Kenneth K. Hall)
- Thompson v. Calderon, No. 95-99014 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1045) (August 3, 1997) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ramos-Oseguera, No. 95-10386 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1028) (July 30, 1997) (Judge Robert Boochever)
- U.S. v. Solano-Godines, No. 96-10255 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 957) (July 21, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Carey, No. 96-7316 (4th Cir.) (120 F.3d 509) (August 18, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 96-3337 (10th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1107) (August 6, 1997) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Ramos-Oseguera, No. 95-10386 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1028) (July 30, 1997) (Judge Robert Boochever)
- U.S. v. Mulderig, No. 95-30206 (5th Cir.) (120 F.3d 534) (August 15, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 96-3337 (10th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1107) (August 6, 1997) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Pierre, No. 96-4187 (11th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1153) (August 28, 1997) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Lanier, No. 93-5608 (6th Cir.) (120 F.3d 640) (August 14, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Thompson v. Calderon, No. 95-99014 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1045) (August 3, 1997) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Mojica v. Reno, No. CV 97-1085(JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (970 F.Supp. 130) (July 11, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Tirrell, No. 96-2752 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 670) (July 15, 1997) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple)
- U.S. v. Ramos-Oseguera, No. 95-10386 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1028) (July 30, 1997) (Judge Robert Boochever)
- U.S. v. Igbonwa, No. 96-1848 (3rd Cir.) (120 F.3d 437) (August 7, 1997) (Judge Max Rosenn)
- U.S. v. Beydler, No. 96-30035 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 985) (July 22, 1997) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- Thompson v. Calderon, No. 95-99014 (9th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1045) (August 3, 1997) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Thompson v. Calderon, No. 95-99014 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 1358) (March 6, 1997) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
More from these topics:
- South Dakota Sobriety Program Participants Will No Longer Be Jailed for Non-Payment of Fees, March 1, 2026. Settlements, Class Certification, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Unlawful Detention, Ability to Pay.
- California Supreme Court Announces Excessive Fines Clauses Are the Proper Method to Challenge Punitive Fines, Holds Equal Protection Requires Courts to Consider Defendant’s Inability to Pay Before Imposing Certain Ancillary Assessments Upon Request, Feb. 1, 2026. Constitution, U.S., Constitution, state, Equal Protection Clause/Claims, Fines, Ability to Pay.
- Report on “Pay-to-Stay” Fees Makes Strong Case for Their Repeal, Jan. 1, 2026. Racial Discrimination, Medical Expenses, Cost of Prison Systems, housing, Ability to Pay.
- Kentucky Supreme Court Voids Prisoner’s $10,972 Jail Fee, July 15, 2025. Booking Fees, Supervision Fee, Ability to Pay.
- Florida’s “Pay to Stay” Law: A Second Sentence for Former Prisoners, May 1, 2025. Ability to Pay.
- Medical Copays Blamed for Reducing Prisoner Access to Healthcare, May 1, 2025. Medical Misconduct, Medical Expenses, Ability to Pay.
- Missouri Repeals “Pay-to-Stay” Law, May 1, 2025. Cost of Prison Systems, Costs, Ability to Pay.
- Fines and Fees Destroy the Impoverished and Perpetuate Mass Incarceration, Jan. 15, 2025. Effects of Mass Incarceration, Ability to Pay.
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Corizon Executes “Texas Two-Step,” Spinning Off Debt Into Bankrupt New Firm to Avoid Paying Creditors and Lawsuit Winners, Aug. 15, 2023. Corizon, Settlements, Ability to Pay.