Skip navigation

U.S. v. Muhammad, No. 96-2434 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 688) (July 21, 1997) (Judge John L. Jr. Kane)

Case suggests that a defendant need not receive any benefits directly in order to have his sentence adjusted under ยง 2C1.1(b)(2)(A) - but see U.S. v. Agostino, 132 F.3d 1183, 1196-98 (7th Cir. 1997) where the Court clarified this holding.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login