In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
Loaded on April 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
April 27, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK - The Confrontation Clause: its goals and purposes.
The Supreme Court has observed that the foundation of the Confrontation Clause guarantee is "the perception that confrontation is essential to fairness. . . . A witness 'may feel quite differently when he has to repeat his …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 97-1523 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 652) (March 2, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (989 F.Supp. 436) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Grimmond, No. 96-4825 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 823) (March 6, 1998) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- U.S. v. Burgos, No. 97-10163 (5th Cir.) (137 F.3d 841) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 1178) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Lanoue, No. 97-1368 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 656) (March 4, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- U.S. v. Rohde, No. 2:97-CR-0200 (D.Utah) (989 F.Supp. 1151) (December 4, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
- U.S. v. Rohde, No. 2:97-CR-0200 (D.Utah) (989 F.Supp. 1151) (December 4, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
- U.S. v. Grimmond, No. 96-4825 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 823) (March 6, 1998) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- Weng v. U.S., No. 96-2918, No. 1780 (2nd Cir.) (137 F.3d 709) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- U.S. v. Barresse, No. 97-3511 (8th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1091) (April 24, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Moses, No. 95-1827 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 894) (February 26, 1998) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 1178) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 97-1523 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 652) (March 2, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Burgos, No. 97-10163 (5th Cir.) (137 F.3d 841) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Michigan, No. 1:84 CV 63 (W.D.Mich.) (989 F.Supp. 853) (July 3, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Enslen)
- U.S. v. Michigan, No. 1:84 CV 63 (W.D.Mich.) (989 F.Supp. 853) (July 3, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Enslen)
- U.S. v. Crowder, No. 92-3133 (D.C. Cir.) (141 F.3d 1202) (May 1, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Tucker, No. 96-3231 (8th Cir.) (137 F.3d 1016) (February 23, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Crowder, No. 92-3133 (D.C. Cir.) (141 F.3d 1202) (May 1, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (989 F.Supp. 436) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 96-4617 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 765) (February 25, 1998) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Holds Sixth Amendment Requires Case-Specific Necessity Determination to Screen Child Witnesses, Rejecting Reliance on Mandatory State Statutes Based on Generalized Legislative Findings, Dec. 15, 2025. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Confrontation Clause.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025. COVID-19, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Practitioner Exception.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.