U.S. v. Burgos, No. 97-10163 (5th Cir.) (137 F.3d 841) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on April 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
April 27, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists.
Case held that application of vulnerable victim Guideline as it existed at the time defednant was sentenced did not violate the ex post facto clause.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 96-4617 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 765) (February 25, 1998) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (989 F.Supp. 436) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Crowder, No. 92-3133 (D.C. Cir.) (141 F.3d 1202) (May 1, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Tucker, No. 96-3231 (8th Cir.) (137 F.3d 1016) (February 23, 1998) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Crowder, No. 92-3133 (D.C. Cir.) (141 F.3d 1202) (May 1, 1998) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Michigan, No. 1:84 CV 63 (W.D.Mich.) (989 F.Supp. 853) (July 3, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Enslen)
- U.S. v. Michigan, No. 1:84 CV 63 (W.D.Mich.) (989 F.Supp. 853) (July 3, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Enslen)
- U.S. v. Burgos, No. 97-10163 (5th Cir.) (137 F.3d 841) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 97-1523 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 652) (March 2, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 1178) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Moses, No. 95-1827 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 894) (February 26, 1998) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Barresse, No. 97-3511 (8th Cir.) (142 F.3d 1091) (April 24, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Weng v. U.S., No. 96-2918, No. 1780 (2nd Cir.) (137 F.3d 709) (February 24, 1998) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- U.S. v. Grimmond, No. 96-4825 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 823) (March 6, 1998) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Rohde, No. 2:97-CR-0200 (D.Utah) (989 F.Supp. 1151) (December 4, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
- U.S. v. Rohde, No. 2:97-CR-0200 (D.Utah) (989 F.Supp. 1151) (December 4, 1997) (Judge J. Thomas Greene)
- U.S. v. Lanoue, No. 97-1368 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 656) (March 4, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- Taylor v. U.S., No. 97-16069 (9th Cir.) (143 F.3d 1178) (May 4, 1998) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Burgos, No. 97-10163 (5th Cir.) (137 F.3d 841) (March 19, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- In Re Wilkinson, No. 96-4133 (6th Cir.) (137 F.3d 911) (March 5, 1998) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- U.S. v. Grimmond, No. 96-4825 (4th Cir.) (137 F.3d 823) (March 6, 1998) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Gigante, No. CR 93-368 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (989 F.Supp. 436) (January 5, 1998) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 97-1523 (1st Cir.) (137 F.3d 652) (March 2, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.