Harris v. U.S., No. 97-6788 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1304) (August 13, 1998) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
September 14, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
Case held that even if a defendant is aware the Governnment intends to seek a sentence enhancement under 21 USC § 851, the court is without jurisdiction to impose that enhancement unless the Government complies with § 851.
This case addresses an interesting issue dealing with the notice provisions of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Thomas, No. 97-1738 (7th Cir.) (150 F.3d 743) (July 23, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Flores, No. 96-1152 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1272) (August 4, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Kizzee, No. 97-60277 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 497) (August 10, 1998) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Quintanar, No. 98-1382 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 902) (July 28, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- Berryman v. Rieger, No. 96-2337 (6th Cir.) (150 F.3d 561) (July 6, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- Harris v. U.S., No. 97-6788 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1304) (August 13, 1998) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Salzano, No. 97-3337 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1238) (July 28, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Sherman, No. 97-7073 (3rd Cir.) (150 F.3d 306) (July 30, 1998) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
- U.S. v. Esparza-Ponce, No. Crim. 97-3252-R (S.D.Cal.) (7 F.Supp.2d 1084) (May 18, 1998) (Judge John S. Sr. Rhoades)
- U.S. v. Shea, No. 97-1069 (1st Cir.) (150 F.3d 44) (July 24, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Jeanes, No. 97-40933 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 483) (August 7, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- Murray v. Dosal, No. 97-2828 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 814) (July 20, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Kronisch v. U.S., No. 97-6116 (2nd Cir.) (150 F.3d 112) (July 9, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 97-2122 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1298) (August 13, 1998) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
More from these topics:
- Third Circuit District Court Erred by Failing to Consider Mitigating Evidence Under § 3553(a) Because It Mistakenly Believed Such Grounds Already Taken Into Consideration Based on Safety-Valve, Minor Role, and Acceptance of Responsibility Departures in, Oct. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigating Role/Circumstances/Evidence, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures, Disclosure Obligations.
- First Circuit: District Court’s One-Sentence Explanation for 10-Year Upward Departure From Sentencing Guidelines Range Insufficient to Justify Significant Variance, Aug. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
- Eleventh Circuit: Time Served Adjustment Is Mandatory Under Sentencing Guidelines Even After Booker, Oct. 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.