Harris v. U.S., No. 97-6788 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1304) (August 13, 1998) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
September 14, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
Case held that even if a defendant is aware the Governnment intends to seek a sentence enhancement under 21 USC § 851, the court is without jurisdiction to impose that enhancement unless the Government complies with § 851.
This case addresses an interesting issue dealing with the notice …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 97-2122 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1298) (August 13, 1998) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- Kronisch v. U.S., No. 97-6116 (2nd Cir.) (150 F.3d 112) (July 9, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- Murray v. Dosal, No. 97-2828 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 814) (July 20, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Jeanes, No. 97-40933 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 483) (August 7, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Shea, No. 97-1069 (1st Cir.) (150 F.3d 44) (July 24, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Esparza-Ponce, No. Crim. 97-3252-R (S.D.Cal.) (7 F.Supp.2d 1084) (May 18, 1998) (Judge John S. Sr. Rhoades)
- U.S. v. Sherman, No. 97-7073 (3rd Cir.) (150 F.3d 306) (July 30, 1998) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Salzano, No. 97-3337 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1238) (July 28, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Harris v. U.S., No. 97-6788 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1304) (August 13, 1998) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- Berryman v. Rieger, No. 96-2337 (6th Cir.) (150 F.3d 561) (July 6, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Quintanar, No. 98-1382 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 902) (July 28, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- U.S. v. Kizzee, No. 97-60277 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 497) (August 10, 1998) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Flores, No. 96-1152 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1272) (August 4, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Thomas, No. 97-1738 (7th Cir.) (150 F.3d 743) (July 23, 1998) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants Who Exercise Right to Jury Trial on Aggravating Circumstances Are Entitled to Closing Argument by Counsel on Those Factors, July 1, 2026. Sixth Amendment, Counsel - Constructive denial of, Possession or Use of Firearms, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures, Grounds for Relief.
- Former South Carolina Jailer Spared Prison After Testimony Fails to Convict Former Sheriff, Feb. 15, 2025. Guard Brutality/Beatings, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures, Offense of Conviction.
- After Florida Appellate Court Holds Crimes of ‘Attempt’ Eligible for Incentive Gain Time, Supreme Court Refuses Review, Jan. 15, 2025. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Conspiracies, Attempts, Solicitations, Attempts/Incomplete Acts, Credits, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
- Third Circuit District Court Erred by Failing to Consider Mitigating Evidence Under § 3553(a) Because It Mistakenly Believed Such Grounds Already Taken Into Consideration Based on Safety-Valve, Minor Role, and Acceptance of Responsibility Departures in, Oct. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigating Role/Circumstances/Evidence, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures, Disclosure Obligations.
- First Circuit: District Court’s One-Sentence Explanation for 10-Year Upward Departure From Sentencing Guidelines Range Insufficient to Justify Significant Variance, Aug. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
- Eleventh Circuit: Time Served Adjustment Is Mandatory Under Sentencing Guidelines Even After Booker, Oct. 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentences - Adjustments and Departures.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.