U.S. v. Kizzee, No. 97-60277 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 497) (August 10, 1998) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1998
published in Punch and Jurists
September 14, 1998
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists.
Case held that district court did not abuse its discretion by failing to grant a continuance to enable new counsel prepare for trial.
For a contrary view, see U.S. v. Garrett, 149 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1998).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Thomas, No. 97-1738 (7th Cir.) (150 F.3d 743) (July 23, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Flores, No. 96-1152 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1272) (August 4, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Kizzee, No. 97-60277 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 497) (August 10, 1998) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Quintanar, No. 98-1382 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 902) (July 28, 1998) (Judge John C. Godbold)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- Berryman v. Rieger, No. 96-2337 (6th Cir.) (150 F.3d 561) (July 6, 1998) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- Harris v. U.S., No. 97-6788 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1304) (August 13, 1998) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Salzano, No. 97-3337 (10th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1238) (July 28, 1998) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Madrid v. Gomez, No. 96-17277 (9th Cir.) (150 F.3d 1030) (July 2, 1998) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Sherman, No. 97-7073 (3rd Cir.) (150 F.3d 306) (July 30, 1998) (Judge Theodore A. McKee)
- U.S. v. Esparza-Ponce, No. Crim. 97-3252-R (S.D.Cal.) (7 F.Supp.2d 1084) (May 18, 1998) (Judge John S. Sr. Rhoades)
- U.S. v. Shea, No. 97-1069 (1st Cir.) (150 F.3d 44) (July 24, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Jeanes, No. 97-40933 (5th Cir.) (150 F.3d 483) (August 7, 1998) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- Murray v. Dosal, No. 97-2828 (8th Cir.) (150 F.3d 814) (July 20, 1998) (Per Curiam)
- Kronisch v. U.S., No. 97-6116 (2nd Cir.) (150 F.3d 112) (July 9, 1998) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 97-2122 (11th Cir.) (149 F.3d 1298) (August 13, 1998) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.