Skip navigation

U.S. v. Shea, No. 97-1069 (1st Cir.) (150 F.3d 44) (July 24, 1998) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)

Here the Court held that the Brady disclosure requirements did not entitle the defendant to discovery of money or rewards provided to Federal agents, since defendant failed to show how that information would exculpate him.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login