U.S. v. Cihler, No. 98-CR-23 (E.D.Wisc.) (28 F.Supp.2d 539) (November 2, 1998) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
February 01, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here Judge Adelman rejected the automatic increase of sentences by blindly using the principles of relevant conduct, stating that sentencing determinations must be based on evidence and reasoned analysis, not mere arbitrary pronouncements.
The defendant in this case pled guilty to possession of 499.28 grams of cocaine with …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Cihler, No. 98-CR-23 (E.D.Wisc.) (28 F.Supp.2d 539) (November 2, 1998) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 96-41246 (5th Cir.) (163 F.3d 255) (December 16, 1998) (Judge Robert M. Parker)
- U.S. v. Cihler, No. 98-CR-23 (E.D.Wisc.) (28 F.Supp.2d 539) (November 2, 1998) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Barajas-Chavez, No. 97-2033 (10th Cir.) (162 F.3d 1285) (January 7, 1999) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
- Richardson v. Reno, No. 98-4230 (11th Cir.) (162 F.3d 1338) (December 22, 1998) (Judge Frank May Hull)
- U.S. v. $9,041,598.68, No. 97-20413 (5th Cir.) (163 F.3d 238) (December 15, 1998) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- U.S. v. Chamberlain, No. 98-1564 (8th Cir.) (163 F.3d 499) (December 24, 1998) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- Sandoval v. Reno, No. 98-1099 (3rd Cir.) (166 F.3d 225) (January 26, 1999) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Castro, No. 96-40687 (5th Cir.) (166 F.3d 728) (January 26, 1999) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Fagan, No. 97-3306 (10th Cir.) (162 F.3d 1280) (December 29, 1998) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Fagan, No. 97-3306 (10th Cir.) (162 F.3d 1280) (December 29, 1998) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Dickerson, No. 97-4750 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 667) (February 8, 1999) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Dickerson, No. 97-4750 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 667) (February 8, 1999) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Dickerson, No. 97-4750 (4th Cir.) (166 F.3d 667) (February 8, 1999) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 3:98cr221 (E.D.Va.) (36 F.Supp.2d 304) (January 26, 1999) (Judge Richard L. Williams)
More from these topics:
- Iowa Department of Corrections Settles Lawsuit and Agrees to Implement More Reliable Drug Testing Procedures and Fair Disciplinary Proceeding Policies, Oct. 1, 2026. Liberty Interests, Evidence, Drug Testing, Settlements, Burden of Proof.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Adoption of Transferred Intent Self-Defense, Jan. 1, 2026. Murder/Felony Murder, Burden of Proof, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.