U.S. v. Lovelock, No. 98-1463 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 339) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
Loaded on May 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
May 03, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
The defendant appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence as the product of an unlawful entry into his apartment. The district court ruled the entry was lawful because the officers were attempting to execute an arrest warrant for a person other than Lovelock and reasonably believe that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Ballek, No. 97-30326 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 871) (March 11, 1999) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 97-2021 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 708) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- U.S. v. LaHue, No. 98-3146 (10th Cir.) (170 F.3d 1026) (March 23, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- Pelissero v. Thompson, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir.) (170 F.3d 442) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- In Re U.S., No. Civ.A. 99-10015-MBD (D.Mass.) (36 F.Supp.2d 430) (February 9, 1999) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Rrapi, No. 98-10081 (9th Cir.) (175 F.3d 742) (May 4, 1999) (Judge Samuel P. King)
- U.S. v. Lovelock, No. 98-1463 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 339) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- Crofton v. Roe, No. 97-35121 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 957) (March 26, 1999) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)
- U.S. v. Condon, No. 97-3378 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 687) (March 9, 1999) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 1153) (April 16, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Sacko, No. 97-2386 (1st Cir.) (170 F.3d 227) (March 15, 1999) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- Paul P. v. Verniero, No. 97-5791 (3rd Cir.) (170 F.3d 396) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Napoli, No. 98-1124 (2nd Cir.) (179 F.3d 1) (April 28, 1999) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- U.S. v. Mapp, No. 97-1342 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 328) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- Florida v. White, No. 98-223 (U.S. Supreme Court) (526 U.S. 559; 119 S.Ct. 1555) (May 17, 1999) (Justice Thomas)
More from these topics:
- First Circuit Holds No Emergency-Aid Exception to Warrant Requirement Where Police Have Information That Subject Is Already Deceased, Feb. 15, 2025. Emergency Aid Doctrine, Police/Govt Misconduct, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Statements By a Deceased Person.
- Nevada Supreme Court Announces Incorporated Probable Cause Affidavit Cannot Broaden Scope of Warrant’s Description of Places and Persons to be Searched or Items to Be Seized, Dec. 1, 2024. Probable/Proximate Cause, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Delaware Supreme Court: Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Challenge Search of Cellphone Where Consent Was Ambiguous and Warrant Constituted a General Warrant, Nov. 1, 2024. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Mansor Ruling for Search Warrants for Digital Data and Announces Framework for Suppression When Warrant Contains Both Constitutional and Unconstitutional Search Categories, Oct. 1, 2023. Particularity Requirement, Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- State Attorneys General Fear New FedEx and UPS Shipping Policies Will Allow the Feds to Bypass Warrant Requirements by Creating a Private Gun Registry, Dec. 13, 2022. Warrantless Searches, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Guns - Type of.
- Georgia Supreme Court Declares ‘Relevance’ Not Legal Standard for Suppression Determination Where Items Seized Outside Scope of Warrant, Clarifies Plain View Doctrine Proper Standard, and Overrules McBee, Walsh Line of Cases, Feb. 15, 2022. Suppression of Evidence, Searches - Plain View, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Reverse Location Warrants Neglect Particularity Requirement, May 15, 2021. Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Right to Resist Unlawful Arrest and Announces Right Includes Use of Proportionate Force Against Government Property, Dec. 15, 2020. Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.