U.S. v. Mapp, No. 97-1342 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 328) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
Loaded on May 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
May 03, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Here the Court rejected a claim that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when Federal officials arranged for the defendant to be placed in a holding cell with cooperating witnesses.
Defendants Mapp and Moore were convicted of various racketeering offenses after trial. Moore contended that the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Florida v. White, No. 98-223 (U.S. Supreme Court) (526 U.S. 559; 119 S.Ct. 1555) (May 17, 1999) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Mapp, No. 97-1342 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 328) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Napoli, No. 98-1124 (2nd Cir.) (179 F.3d 1) (April 28, 1999) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- Paul P. v. Verniero, No. 97-5791 (3rd Cir.) (170 F.3d 396) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Sacko, No. 97-2386 (1st Cir.) (170 F.3d 227) (March 15, 1999) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 1153) (April 16, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Condon, No. 97-3378 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 687) (March 9, 1999) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Crofton v. Roe, No. 97-35121 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 957) (March 26, 1999) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)
- U.S. v. Lovelock, No. 98-1463 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 339) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Rrapi, No. 98-10081 (9th Cir.) (175 F.3d 742) (May 4, 1999) (Judge Samuel P. King)
- In Re U.S., No. Civ.A. 99-10015-MBD (D.Mass.) (36 F.Supp.2d 430) (February 9, 1999) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- Pelissero v. Thompson, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir.) (170 F.3d 442) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. LaHue, No. 98-3146 (10th Cir.) (170 F.3d 1026) (March 23, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 97-2021 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 708) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Ballek, No. 97-30326 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 871) (March 11, 1999) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Holds Sixth Amendment Requires Case-Specific Necessity Determination to Screen Child Witnesses, Rejecting Reliance on Mandatory State Statutes Based on Generalized Legislative Findings, Dec. 15, 2025. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Confrontation Clause.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025. COVID-19, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Practitioner Exception.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.