U.S. v. Mapp, No. 97-1342 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 328) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
Loaded on May 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
May 03, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Here the Court rejected a claim that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when Federal officials arranged for the defendant to be placed in a holding cell with cooperating witnesses.
Defendants Mapp and Moore were convicted of various racketeering offenses after trial. Moore contended that the district court …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Florida v. White, No. 98-223 (U.S. Supreme Court) (526 U.S. 559; 119 S.Ct. 1555) (May 17, 1999) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Mapp, No. 97-1342 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 328) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Napoli, No. 98-1124 (2nd Cir.) (179 F.3d 1) (April 28, 1999) (Judge Sonia Sotomayor)
- Paul P. v. Verniero, No. 97-5791 (3rd Cir.) (170 F.3d 396) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Sacko, No. 97-2386 (1st Cir.) (170 F.3d 227) (March 15, 1999) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (172 F.3d 1153) (April 16, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Condon, No. 97-3378 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 687) (March 9, 1999) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Crofton v. Roe, No. 97-35121 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 957) (March 26, 1999) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)
- U.S. v. Lovelock, No. 98-1463 (2nd Cir.) (170 F.3d 339) (March 16, 1999) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Rrapi, No. 98-10081 (9th Cir.) (175 F.3d 742) (May 4, 1999) (Judge Samuel P. King)
- In Re U.S., No. Civ.A. 99-10015-MBD (D.Mass.) (36 F.Supp.2d 430) (February 9, 1999) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. DeRoover, No. CR 98 965 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (36 F.Supp.2d 531) (February 16, 1999) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- Pelissero v. Thompson, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir.) (170 F.3d 442) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. Aviles, No. 96-10110 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 863) (March 15, 1999) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. LaHue, No. 98-3146 (10th Cir.) (170 F.3d 1026) (March 23, 1999) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-5895 (6th Cir.) (170 F.3d 617) (March 22, 1999) (Judge Paul D. Borman)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 97-2021 (7th Cir.) (170 F.3d 708) (March 12, 1999) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Ballek, No. 97-30326 (9th Cir.) (170 F.3d 871) (March 11, 1999) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
More from these topics:
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025. COVID-19, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Practitioner Exception.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.
- Maryland Court of Appeals Announces Standard for Whether Scientific Evidence Is ‘Testimonial’ for Confrontation Right Purposes Under Article 21 of Maryland Declaration of Rights, Nov. 15, 2021. junk science, Confrontation Clause/Rights.