U.S. v. Davis, No. 98-3574 (6th Cir.) (187 F.3d 528) (August 9, 1999) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 1999
published in Punch and Jurists
October 11, 1999
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentences - Authorized.
Here the Court held that a defendant, who had received a maximum two-year term of imprisonment following revocation of supervised release, could not in addition be sentenced to a new term of supervised release under 18 USC § 3583(h).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Bellis v. Davis, No. 99-1203 (8th Cir.) (186 F.3d 1092) (August 10, 1999) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Schave, No. 98-3691 (7th Cir.) (186 F.3d 839) (August 2, 1999) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Monzon-Valenzuela, No. 98-30202 (9th Cir.) (186 F.3d 1181) (September 10, 1999) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Schave, No. 98-3691 (7th Cir.) (186 F.3d 839) (August 2, 1999) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Armstrong, No. 98-4905 (4th Cir.) (187 F.3d 392) (July 15, 1999) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Hambrick, No. CRIM. A. 98-0042-C (W.D.Va.) (55 F.Supp.2d 504) (July 7, 1999) (Judge James H. Jr. Michael)
- In Re Sealed Case No. 99-3096 (Brady Obligations), No. 99-3096 (D.C. Cir.) (185 F.3d 887) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- In Re Sealed Case No. 99-3096 (Brady Obligations), No. 99-3096 (D.C. Cir.) (185 F.3d 887) (July 21, 1999) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- Phan v. Reno, No. C98-234Z (W.D.Wash.) (56 F.Supp.2d 1149) (July 9, 1999) (Judge John C. Coughenour)
- U.S. v. Messino, No. 93 CR 294 (N.D.Ill.) (56 F.Supp.2d 989) (February 24, 1999) (Judge Suzanne B. Conlon)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 98-50271 (5th Cir.) (187 F.3d 516) (August 30, 1999) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
- U.S. v. Brown, No. 98-30463 (5th Cir.) (186 F.3d 661) (August 24, 1999) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Robinson, No. 98-50271 (5th Cir.) (187 F.3d 516) (August 30, 1999) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 98-3574 (6th Cir.) (187 F.3d 528) (August 9, 1999) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie)
- U.S. v. Escobar-De Jesus, No. 93-1608 (1st Cir.) (187 F.3d 148) (August 2, 1999) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- Ramdass v. Angelone, No. 98-30 (4th Cir.) (187 F.3d 396) (August 3, 1999) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces Single Act Violating Both 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and 924(j) May Result in Only One Conviction, Ruling Congress Did Not Clearly Express Intent to Overcome Blockburger Presumption Against Cumulative Punishment for Same Offense, Feb. 1, 2026. Double jeopardy, Gun Laws/Crimes, Sentences - Authorized, Multiple/Multiplicious Counts, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Courts Have Inherent Authority to Correct Unauthorized Sentences at Any Time Without Habeas Petition, Jan. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, Possession or Use of Firearms, Sentences - Authorized, Sentences - Corrections or Modifications of, Effect of Vacatur.
- Federal Sentencing Guidelines Undergo Substantial Amendments, Jan. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, First Step Act, Violence Against Women Act, Criminal History, Qualifying Offenses, Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Sexual Exploitation of Minors, Federally Protected Rights, Sexual Conduct with Minors, Sentences - Authorized, Safety Valve, Acceptance of Responsibility, Preservation of Judicial Resources, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Sixth Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Prove Sentencing Enhancements Apply, Jan. 15, 2021. Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Sentences - Authorized.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.