U.S. v. Brimah, No. 99-2927 (7th Cir.) (214 F.3d 854) (May 26, 2000) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
Loaded on July 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
July 24, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exclusionary Rule.
Here the 7hh Circuit rejected a challenge to the use of illegally seized evidence at sentencing - a rule followed by most Circuits; but the panel expressly left open the question of whether suppression would be necessary if the police act egregiously.
This case and the Ninth Circuit's …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Knights, No. 99-10538 (9th Cir.) (219 F.3d 1138) (August 3, 2000) (Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez)
- U.S. v. Thames, No. 99-31092 (5th Cir.) (214 F.3d 608) (June 13, 2000) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Bull, No. 98-3835 (11th Cir.) (214 F.3d 1275) (June 12, 2000) (Judge Paul H. Roney)
- U.S. v. Bull, No. 98-3835 (11th Cir.) (214 F.3d 1275) (June 12, 2000) (Judge Paul H. Roney)
- Ryan v. U.S., No. 98-1736 (7th Cir.) (214 F.3d 877) (June 5, 2000) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Pinjuv, No. 99-10597 (9th Cir.) (218 F.3d 1125) (July 21, 2000) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Prince, No. 98-6361 (6th Cir.) (214 F.3d 740) (June 1, 2000) (Judge Sandra S. Beckwith)
- U.S. v. Holland, No. 99-6823 (4th Cir.) (214 F.3d 523) (June 15, 2000) (Judge Norman K. Moon)
- U.S. v. Brimah, No. 99-2927 (7th Cir.) (214 F.3d 854) (May 26, 2000) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Haynes, No. 98-30221 (9th Cir.) (216 F.3d 789) (June 16, 2000) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
- U.S. v. Torres-Ramirez, No. 99-1791 (7th Cir.) (213 F.3d 978) (May 23, 2000) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
More from these topics:
- Minnesota Supreme Court Announces Warrantless Buccal Swab Pursuant to Discovery Order Violates Fourth Amendment, Overrules Inevitable Discovery Precedent, and Clarifies Accomplice-Corroboration Statute Applies Only to Sworn Testimony, Dec. 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, Warrantless Searches, Good Faith Exception, Hearsay Evidence/Exceptions, Exclusionary Rule.
- Idaho Supreme Court Announces Warrantless Search of Civilly Committed Individual Violates Fourth Amendment, Oct. 15, 2025. Civil Commitment, Exclusionary Rule, Pat Down Searches, Scope of Permissible Searches, Suspicionless Searches.
- Oregon Parole Hearing Exclusion Rule Invalidated, Sept. 15, 2023. Parole Board Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Exclusionary Rule, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Good-Faith Exception to Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable to Warrant Based on Affidavit Stating Cellphones Found at Scene of Traffic Crash ‘May’ Contain Evidence, May 15, 2023. Traffic Stops, Good Faith Exception, Exclusionary Rule.
- California Supreme Court Announces Predicate Offenses for Gang Enhancement or Gang Participation Not Provable Using Expert Witness Testimony Without Personal Knowledge of Facts, Sept. 15, 2021. Opinions and Expert Testimony, Gang Membership, Exclusionary Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.