U.S. v. Garcia-Guizar, No. 99-10435 (9th Cir.) (234 F.3d 483) (September 20, 2000) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
September 04, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
This case is a follow-up to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. Nordby, No. 99-10191 (9th Cir. 9/11/2000), which was discussed in last week’s issue of P&J (8/28/00). Once again, the Ninth Circuit has held that, under the ruling in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Working, No. 98-30121 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 1093) (September 11, 2000) (Judge Barry G. Silverman)
- Mendoza Toro v. Gil, No. Civ. 00-1846 HL (D.Puerto Rico) (106 F.Supp.2d 306) (July 11, 2000) (Judge Hector M. Laffitte)
- Mendoza Toro v. Gil, No. Civ. No. 00-1846 HL (D.Puerto Rico) (110 F.Supp.2d 28) (July 26, 2000) (Judge Hector M. Laffitte)
- U.S. v. Henderson, No. Crim.A. 2:99-00214-0 (S.D.W.Va.) (105 F.3d 523) (July 19, 2000) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Kelly, No. CR. 00-0652-R (S.D.Cal.) (105 F.Supp.2d 1107) (July 14, 2000) (Judge John S. Sr. Rhoades)
- U.S. v. Vonn, No. 98-50385 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 1152) (September 14, 2000) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Garcia-Guizar, No. 99-10435 (9th Cir.) (234 F.3d 483) (September 20, 2000) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Garcia-Guizar, No. 99-10435 (9th Cir.) (234 F.3d 483) (September 20, 2000) (Judge Jr. William C. Canby)
- U.S. v. Espinoza, No. 00-CR-0073 (E.D.Wisc.) (105 F.Supp.2d 1015) (July 13, 2000) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Cervantes, No. 98-50722 (9th Cir.) (219 F.3d 882) (June 12, 2000) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Polichemi, No. 96-3866 (7th Cir.) (219 F.3d 698) (July 5, 2000) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 98-1501 (7th Cir.) (223 F.3d 554) (August 17, 2000) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Working, No. 98-30121 (9th Cir.) (175 F.3d 1150) (May 6, 1999) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.