U.S. v. Recio, No. 99-30135 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1069) (September 27, 2000) (Judge James R. Browning)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
September 11, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sufficiency of Evidence.
The two defendants in this consolidated appeal, Francisco Jimenez Recio and Adrian Lopez-Meza, appealed their convictions of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. Jimenez Recio also appealed his conviction for possession with intent to distribute.
Recio and Lopez-Meza were arrested for their part in transporting a ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Lanier v. U.S., No. 98-2689 (7th Cir.) (220 F.3d 833) (June 12, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- Free Speech Coalition v. Reno, No. 97-16536 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1113) (July 24, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (218 F.3d 1118) (July 14, 2000) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Littlejohn, No. 99-50417 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 960) (September 11, 2000) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Littlejohn, No. 99-50417 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 960) (September 11, 2000) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Swatzie, No. 00-10729 (11th Cir.) (228 F.3d 1278) (September 27, 2000) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 99-10734 (5th Cir.) (220 F.3d 635) (July 26, 2000) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Lindberg, No. 99-10371 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1120) (July 27, 2000) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Knott, No. CRIM. A. 98-40022-NMG (D.Mass.) (106 F.Supp.2d 174) (July 27, 2000) (Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton)
- U.S. v. Silkman, No. 99-4338 (8th Cir.) (220 F.3d 935) (August 30, 2000) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Romero-Rendon, No. 99-50137 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1159) (July 31, 2000) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 00-1039 (1st Cir.) (228 F.3d 1) (September 28, 2000) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Maslin, No. 99-CR-159-7 (N.D.N.Y.) (2000 WL 1294254) (September 14, 2000) (Judge Thomas J. McAvoy)
- U.S. v. Recio, No. 99-30135 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1069) (September 27, 2000) (Judge James R. Browning)
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (218 F.3d 1118) (July 14, 2000) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces Invoking Fifth Amendment While Testifying at Trial Does Not Contradict Prior Proffer Statement Nor Does Questioning the Sufficiency of the Prosecution’s Evidence, July 1, 2025. Fifth Amendment, Sufficiency of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Proffer Agreements/Statements/Sessions.
- Shelby County DA Oversees Retesting After Forensic Analyst’s Dismissal for ‘Unethical Conduct’, July 1, 2025. Crime Labs, Appealable Issues/Orders, Sufficiency of Evidence, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of.
- From Witness Descriptions to Digital Mugshots: AI’s Growing Role in Policing, July 1, 2025. Sufficiency of Evidence, Advanced Imaging Technology, Profiling Evidence.
- Los Angeles Criminal Legal System Undermined by Months of Faulty DNA Testing, May 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, Sufficiency of Evidence, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Admission of Defendant’s Rap Videos at Trial Was Unfair Propensity Evidence and Orders New Trial, Sept. 1, 2024. Prisoner Media, Sufficiency of Evidence, Social Media.
- Kansas Supreme Court Announces State Must Prove Defendant Specifically Intended to Enter Dwelling in Which There Was a Person to Sustain Conviction for Attempted Aggravated Burglary, Overruling State v. Watson, Jan. 15, 2024. State Statutes, Sufficiency of Evidence, Specific Offenses.
- Aversion to Error: Americans View Wrongful Acquittals and Wrongful Convictions to Be Errors of Equal Magnitude, Dec. 5, 2022. Wrongful Conviction, Sufficiency of Evidence.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.