U.S. v. Romero-Rendon, No. 99-50137 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1159) (July 31, 2000) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2000
published in Punch and Jurists
September 11, 2000
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here, slightly modifying its previous decision reported at 198 F.3d 745, the Court held that an unchallenged presentence report was sufficient to prove by clear and convincing evidence the facts supporting a sentencing enhancement.
In this revised decision, the Court acknowledged that there is some uncertainty in the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (218 F.3d 1118) (July 14, 2000) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Recio, No. 99-30135 (9th Cir.) (258 F.3d 1069) (September 27, 2000) (Judge James R. Browning)
- U.S. v. Maslin, No. 99-CR-159-7 (N.D.N.Y.) (2000 WL 1294254) (September 14, 2000) (Judge Thomas J. McAvoy)
- U.S. v. Martin, No. 00-1039 (1st Cir.) (228 F.3d 1) (September 28, 2000) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Romero-Rendon, No. 99-50137 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1159) (July 31, 2000) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Silkman, No. 99-4338 (8th Cir.) (220 F.3d 935) (August 30, 2000) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Knott, No. CRIM. A. 98-40022-NMG (D.Mass.) (106 F.Supp.2d 174) (July 27, 2000) (Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton)
- U.S. v. Lindberg, No. 99-10371 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1120) (July 27, 2000) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 99-10734 (5th Cir.) (220 F.3d 635) (July 26, 2000) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Swatzie, No. 00-10729 (11th Cir.) (228 F.3d 1278) (September 27, 2000) (Judge Emmett Ripley Cox)
- U.S. v. Littlejohn, No. 99-50417 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 960) (September 11, 2000) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Littlejohn, No. 99-50417 (9th Cir.) (224 F.3d 960) (September 11, 2000) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Barrios-Gutierrez, No. 99-10148 (9th Cir.) (218 F.3d 1118) (July 14, 2000) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- Free Speech Coalition v. Reno, No. 97-16536 (9th Cir.) (220 F.3d 1113) (July 24, 2000) (Per Curiam)
- Lanier v. U.S., No. 98-2689 (7th Cir.) (220 F.3d 833) (June 12, 2000) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
More from these topics:
- Iowa Department of Corrections Settles Lawsuit and Agrees to Implement More Reliable Drug Testing Procedures and Fair Disciplinary Proceeding Policies, Oct. 1, 2026. Liberty Interests, Evidence, Drug Testing, Settlements, Burden of Proof.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Adoption of Transferred Intent Self-Defense, Jan. 1, 2026. Murder/Felony Murder, Burden of Proof, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.