Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on April 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists April 09, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues.

Here, after the Supreme Court vacated the Eleventh Circuit's previous decision in this case in light of Apprendi, the Court held that such a remand did not require it to treat the case as though the Apprendi issue had been timely raised.

After the Eleventh Circuit's earlier unpublished decision in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  2. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, No. 99-1884 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 394; 121 S.Ct. 1567) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  3. U.S. v. Tarkoff, No. 99-13223 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 991) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
  4. U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: