U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on April 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
April 09, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
This case is noted for its discussion of two Apprendi issues: a) whether Apprendi requires the jury to determine the facts needed to impose a mandatory minimum; and b) whether, on a remand, the court can reimpose the same sentence by "stacking" sentences.
This is an interesting Apprendi …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, No. 99-1884 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 394; 121 S.Ct. 1567) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Tarkoff, No. 99-13223 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 991) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces Single Act Violating Both 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and 924(j) May Result in Only One Conviction, Ruling Congress Did Not Clearly Express Intent to Overcome Blockburger Presumption Against Cumulative Punishment for Same Offense, Feb. 1, 2026. Double jeopardy, Gun Laws/Crimes, Sentences - Authorized, Multiple/Multiplicious Counts, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Supreme Court of Maryland Announces Division of Correction Must Immediately Apply Time-Served Credit Against Valid Sentences When Convictions Are Vacated and May Not Toll Execution Pending Reprosecution; New Sentences Arising From New Convictions Take, Jan. 1, 2026. Habeas Corpus, Overdetention, Effect of Vacatur, Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies Procedure for Crediting Jail Time to Multiple Contemporaneously-Imposed Sentences, Aug. 1, 2025. Good Time, Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- California Appellate Court: Custody Credits Must be Applied to Concurrent Terms in Multiple Open Cases, June 1, 2025. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- California Court of Appeal Strikes Prison Prior Enhancement for Invalid Predicate Offense Under § 1172.75 Despite Concurrently Served Valid Predicate, Feb. 1, 2025. Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Predicate Acts/Offenses, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Washington Supreme Court: Nonexceptional Consecutive Terms of ‘Community Custody’ May Not Exceed Aggregate Term of 24 Months, May 15, 2024. Parole, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Multiple Sentences, Aggregate Sentence.
- Sixth Circuit: Sentence Procedurally Unreasonable Where District Court Failed to Explain Decision to Impose Consecutive Sentences and Substantively Unreasonable Where Court Improperly Weighed Sentencing Factors, Oct. 1, 2023. Failure to Explain Consequences, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Impermissible Factors.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- SCOTUS Announces § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii)’s Consecutive Sentence Mandate Not Applicable to § 924(j) Sentences, Aug. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules That Time Served for Concurrent Sentences Can Be Counted Only Once for Sentence Credit, April 24, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.