U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)
This case is noted for its discussion of two Apprendi issues: a) whether Apprendi requires the jury to determine the facts needed to impose a mandatory minimum; and b) whether, on a remand, the court can reimpose the same sentence by "stacking" sentences.
This is an interesting Apprendi decision because ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login