Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on April 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists April 09, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Drug Quantity.

On remand from the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit agreed to rehear this drug sentencing case en banc because of its "exceptional importance"; and it requested the parties to address three specific questions.

This brief per curiam order is phase two of one of the 49 convictions vacated to date ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  2. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, No. 99-1884 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 394; 121 S.Ct. 1567) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  3. U.S. v. Tarkoff, No. 99-13223 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 991) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
  4. U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: