U.S. v. Barton, No. 00-10233 (5th Cir.) (257 F.3d 433) (July 9, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
August 27, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here the Court held that the Apprendi rule does not require the jury to make a finding that the defendant discharged a firearm in order for the defendant to be subjected to an increased mandatory minimum sentence under 18 USC § 924(c)(a)(A)(iii).
One of the issues raised on …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Buckland, No. 99-30285 (9th Cir.) (289 F.3d 558) (May 7, 2002) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Bearden, No. 00-3898 (8th Cir.) (265 F.3d 732) (September 12, 2001) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)
- U.S. v. Holder, No. 00-7133 (10th Cir.) (256 F.3d 959) (July 10, 2001) (Judge John C. Porfilio)
- U.S. v. Le, No. 00-11124 (11th Cir.) (256 F.3d 1229) (July 11, 2001) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- Milstein v. Cooley, No. 99-56682 (9th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1004) (July 20, 2001) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
- U.S. v. Barton, No. 00-10233 (5th Cir.) (257 F.3d 433) (July 9, 2001) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Walter, No. 00-10384 (9th Cir.) (256 F.3d 891) (July 18, 2001) (Judge Donald P. Lay)
- U.S. v. Guevara-Martinez, No. 00-3855 (8th Cir.) (262 F.3d 751) (August 20, 2001) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)
- U.S. v. Fallen, No. 99-11329 (11th Cir.) (256 F.3d 1082) (July 9, 2001) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Teeter, No. 00-2332 (1st Cir.) (257 F.3d 14) (July 23, 2001) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Grant, No. 99-12052 (11th Cir.) (256 F.3d 1146) (July 10, 2001) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- Mitchell v. Mason, No. 99-1839 (6th Cir.) (257 F.3d 554) (July 12, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
More from these topics:
- Iowa Department of Corrections Settles Lawsuit and Agrees to Implement More Reliable Drug Testing Procedures and Fair Disciplinary Proceeding Policies, Oct. 1, 2026. Liberty Interests, Evidence, Drug Testing, Settlements, Burden of Proof.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Adoption of Transferred Intent Self-Defense, Jan. 1, 2026. Murder/Felony Murder, Burden of Proof, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.