Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Vasquez-Zamora, No. 99-52282 (5th Cir.) (253 F.3d 211) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Eldon E. Fallon)

Loaded on July 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists July 23, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.

Here the Court held that where a district court could have imposed consecutive prison terms for each count of the indictment, its finding that concurrent terms for both counts was appropriate punishment for the defendant rendered its violation of the Apprendi-rule prejudicial.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Bean v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, No. 00-40304 (5th Cir.) (253 F.3d 234) (June 20, 2001) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
  2. U.S. v. Trask, No. CRIM. 00CR10111-NG (D.Mass.) (143 F.Supp.2d 88) (April 20, 2001) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
  3. U.S. v. Carlos-Colmenares, No. 00-3632 (7th Cir.) (253 F.3d 276) (June 7, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  4. Doe v. U.S., No. 00-4352 (6th Cir.) (253 F.3d 256) (June 14, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
  5. U.S. v. Vasquez-Zamora, No. 99-52282 (5th Cir.) (253 F.3d 211) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Eldon E. Fallon)
  6. U.S. v. Pelullo, No. CR. 91-60 (E.D.Pa.) (144 F.Supp.2d 369) (April 26, 2001) (Judge Robert F. Kelly)
  7. U.S. v. Hill, No. 00-30023 (9th Cir.) (257 F.3d 1116) (July 27, 2001) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
  8. U.S. v. Hoskie, No. 3:99CR128 (EBB) (D.Conn.) (144 F.Supp.2d 108) (April 20, 2001) (Judge Ellen Bree Burns)
  9. U.S. v. Sidhom, No. Cr. No. 98-10289-EFH (D.Mass.) (144 F.Supp.2d 41) (June 19, 2001) (Judge Edward F. Harrington)
  10. U.S. v. Clark, No. 99-50485 (5th Cir.) (260 F.3d 382) (July 26, 2001) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

More from these topics: