Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Diaz, No. 99-4166 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1065) (April 17, 2001) (Judge David D. Jr. Dowd)

Loaded on June 1, 2001 published in Punch and Jurists June 04, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Burden of Proof.

Here, the Court strongly affirmed the position it took in U.S. v. Harris, 244 F.3d 828 (11th Cir. 2001) to the effect that "Sentencing Guideline issues are not subject to the Apprendi rule and, thus, there is no requirement that sentencing facts be submitted to a jury and found beyond ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. I.N.S. v. St. Cyr, No. 00-767 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 289; 121 S.Ct. 2271) (June 25, 2001) (Justice Stevens)
  2. Calcano-Martinez v. I.N.S., No. 00-1011 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 348; 121 S.Ct. 2268) (June 25, 2001) (Justice Stevens)
  3. U.S. v. Fort, No. 00-10418 (5th Cir.) (248 F.3d 475) (April 17, 2001) (Judge Jerome Farris)
  4. U.S. v. Jones, No. 00-3941 (7th Cir.) (248 F.3d 671) (April 24, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
  5. U.S. v. Marshall, No. 99-4053 (6th Cir.) (248 F.3d 525) (April 25, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
  6. Bracy v. Schomig, No. 99-4318 (7th Cir.) (248 F.3d 604) (April 18, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  7. Daniels v. U.S., No. 00-6298 (10th Cir.) (254 F.3d 1180) (June 25, 2001) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
  8. U.S. v. Loe, No. 00-40454 (5th Cir.) (248 F.3d 449) (April 17, 2001) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
  9. U.S. v. Diaz, No. 99-4166 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1065) (April 17, 2001) (Judge David D. Jr. Dowd)
  10. U.S. v. Yeaman, No. 00-1498 (3rd Cir.) (248 F.3d 223) (April 26, 2001) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)

More from these topics: