U.S. v. Jones, No. 00-3941 (7th Cir.) (248 F.3d 671) (April 24, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
Loaded on June 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
June 04, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here the Court held that attributing drugs sold by defendant to others as relevant conduct, thereby increasing base offense level, did not implicate the Apprendi rule so long as the sentence imposed did not exceed the statutory maximum.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- I.N.S. v. St. Cyr, No. 00-767 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 289; 121 S.Ct. 2271) (June 25, 2001) (Justice Stevens)
- Calcano-Martinez v. I.N.S., No. 00-1011 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 348; 121 S.Ct. 2268) (June 25, 2001) (Justice Stevens)
- U.S. v. Loe, No. 00-40454 (5th Cir.) (248 F.3d 449) (April 17, 2001) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- Daniels v. U.S., No. 00-6298 (10th Cir.) (254 F.3d 1180) (June 25, 2001) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
- U.S. v. Diaz, No. 99-4166 (11th Cir.) (248 F.3d 1065) (April 17, 2001) (Judge David D. Jr. Dowd)
- U.S. v. Marshall, No. 99-4053 (6th Cir.) (248 F.3d 525) (April 25, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 00-3941 (7th Cir.) (248 F.3d 671) (April 24, 2001) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Fort, No. 00-10418 (5th Cir.) (248 F.3d 475) (April 17, 2001) (Judge Jerome Farris)
- U.S. v. Yeaman, No. 00-1498 (3rd Cir.) (248 F.3d 223) (April 26, 2001) (Judge Walter K. Stapleton)
- Bracy v. Schomig, No. 99-4318 (7th Cir.) (248 F.3d 604) (April 18, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
More from these topics:
- Iowa Department of Corrections Settles Lawsuit and Agrees to Implement More Reliable Drug Testing Procedures and Fair Disciplinary Proceeding Policies, Oct. 1, 2026. Liberty Interests, Evidence, Drug Testing, Settlements, Burden of Proof.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Adoption of Transferred Intent Self-Defense, Jan. 1, 2026. Murder/Felony Murder, Burden of Proof, Negligence/Reckless Endangerment.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.