U.S. v. Marshall, No. 99-4053 (6th Cir.) (248 F.3d 525) (April 25, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
Here the Court held that purchasing jewlery and wine with stolen money is not money laundering under 18 USC 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) because the defendant's misstatements of fact were to a party unrelated to the transaction.
The defendant in this case was convicted on three counts of money laundering in violation of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login