U.S. v. Noble, No. 99-2899 (7th Cir.) (246 F.3d 946) (April 5, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
Loaded on March 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
March 19, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Here the Court reversed a sentence based on Apprendi, holding that the limited physical evidence and minimal corroborating testimony available in this case warranted reversal under the “seriously affecting fairness” standard.
To date, the Seventh Circuit has published more decisions denying appellate relief based on Apprendi v. New …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Lopez-Pastrana, No. 00-10146 (9th Cir.) (244 F.3d 1025) (March 28, 2001) (Judge Joseph T. Sneed)
- U.S. v. Edmonds, No. 00-3039 (D.C. Cir.) (240 F.3d 55) (February 27, 2001) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
- U.S. v. Corral-Gastelum, No. 99-10582 (9th Cir.) (240 F.3d 1181) (March 5, 2001) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Christopher, No. 00-10899 (11th Cir.) (239 F.3d 1191) (January 22, 2001) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Pease, No. 99-2301 (11th Cir.) (240 F.3d 938) (January 30, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-1590 (8th Cir.) (240 F.3d 732) (January 26, 2001) (Judge Theodore McMillian)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 99-3077 (D.C. Cir.) (240 F.3d 39) (February 23, 2001) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- Mattis v. Vaughn, No. CIV.A. 99-6533 (E.D.Pa.) (128 F.Supp.2d 249) (January 17, 2001) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 99-11377 (11th Cir.) (240 F.3d 927) (January 30, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. James, No. 99-390PWG (D.Md.) (128 F.Supp.2d 291) (January 18, 2001) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Lora, No. CR. 98-10054-NG (D.Mass.) (129 F.Supp.2d 77) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Finley, No. 00-1090 (2nd Cir.) (245 F.3d 199) (April 5, 2001) (Judge Wilfred Feinberg)
- U.S. v. Noble, No. 99-2899 (7th Cir.) (246 F.3d 946) (April 5, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.