U.S. v. Banks, No. 99-2031 (6th Cir.) (252 F.3d 801) (May 24, 2001) (Judge Dan Aaron Polster)
This case is noted as a rare example of a defendant successfully challenging a district court's refusal to grant him a sentence reduction based on acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Because a district court’s decision regarding acceptance of responsibility is normally a factual issue, its ruling is ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login