U.S. v. Martinez, No. 99-2025 (6th Cir.) (253 F.3d 251) (June 14, 2001) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
Loaded on May 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
May 28, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Here, on their direct appeal, the defendants argued that their sentences of 240 months and 210 months, respectively, violated the Apprendi rule. Because that issue was not raised at the district court, the Sixth Circuit held that the claim could be reviewed for plain error only. Then, after noting …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Banks, No. 99-2031 (6th Cir.) (252 F.3d 801) (May 24, 2001) (Judge Dan Aaron Polster)
- U.S. v. Ortiz, No. 00-1577 (2nd Cir.) (251 F.3d 305) (May 22, 2001) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
- Duncan v. Walker, No. 00-121 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 167; 121 S.Ct. 2120) (June 18, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
- Saucier v. Katz, No. 99-1977 (U.S. Supreme Court) (533 U.S. 194; 121 S.Ct. 2151) (June 18, 2001) (Justice Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Fields, No. 99-3138 (D.C. Cir.) (251 F.3d 1041) (June 12, 2001) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
- U.S. v. Martinez, No. 99-2025 (6th Cir.) (253 F.3d 251) (June 14, 2001) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)
- Henrikson v. Guzik, No. 00-10810 (5th Cir.) (249 F.3d 395) (April 24, 2001) (Judge Will L. Garwood)
- U.S. v. Resendez-Mendez, No. 00-40585 (5th Cir.) (251 F.3d 514) (May 15, 2001) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Weiner)
- U.S. v. Adkinson, No. 00-14200 (11th Cir.) (247 F.3d 1289) (April 19, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 3:94CR779 (N.D.Ohio) (137 F.Supp.2d 919) (March 30, 2001) (Judge John W. Potter)
- Borodin v. Ashcroft, No. 01 CV 1433 (E.D.N.Y.) (136 F.Supp.2d 125) (March 21, 2001) (Judge Eugene H. Nickerson)
- U.S. v. DeLeon, No. 00-50256 (5th Cir.) (247 F.3d 593) (April 9, 2001) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- Reynolds v. Cambra, No. CV977048CBMAJW (C.D.Cal.) (136 F.Supp.2d 1071) (March 9, 2001) (Judge Consuelo Bland Marshall)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.