Skip navigation

U.S. v. Martinez, No. 99-2025 (6th Cir.) (253 F.3d 251) (June 14, 2001) (Judge Nathaniel R. Jones)

Here, on their direct appeal, the defendants argued that their sentences of 240 months and 210 months, respectively, violated the Apprendi rule. Because that issue was not raised at the district court, the Sixth Circuit held that the claim could be reviewed for plain error only. Then, after noting that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login