Skip navigation

Andrade v. Attorney General of California, No. 99-55691 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 743) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Paez)

Here a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the imposition of two, consecutive 25- years-to-life sentences under California’s three strikes statutes on a defendant who was convicted of petty theft constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

In a decision with far more bark than bite, a divided panel from ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login