Andrade v. Attorney General of California, No. 99-55691 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 743) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
October 15, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
Here a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the imposition of two, consecutive 25- years-to-life sentences under California’s three strikes statutes on a defendant who was convicted of petty theft constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
In a decision with far more bark than bite, a divided …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Arena, No. 00 Cr. 398 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y.) (2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17522) (October 29, 2001) (Judge John F. Keenan)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-3129 (D.C. Cir.) (267 F.3d 1154) (October 30, 2001) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- Andrade v. Attorney General of California, No. 99-55691 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 743) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
- U.S. v. Shark, No. Crim. No. 92-0405-05 (JGP) (D.D.C.) (158 F.Supp.2d 43) (July 31, 2001) (Judge John Garrett Penn)
- U.S. v. Angwin, No. 00-50276 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 979) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Charles R. Breyer)
- Ortega v. U.S., No. 01-1168 (8th Cir.) (270 F.3d 540) (November 1, 2001) (Judge Donald R. Ross)
- U.S. v. Bjorkman, No. 99-3302 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 482) (October 30, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. K, No. 00-CR-951 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 421) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Markin, No. 99-3977 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 491) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- Tremper v. Ulster County Dept. of Probation, No. 01-CV-1125 (N.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 352) (August 22, 2001) (Judge David N. Hurd)
- U.S. v. Barragan, No. 00-30335 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 919) (August 29, 2001) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Ennenga, No. 00-1226 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 499) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
More from these topics:
- California Supreme Court Announces Single Criminal Act Harming Multiple Victims Constitutes Only One Strike Under Three Strikes Law, Jan. 1, 2026. Double jeopardy, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Prior Conviction/Sentence/Incarceration.
- Sixth Circuit: Erlinger Error Requires Resentencing Where Government Cannot Prove Beyond Reasonable Doubt That Jury Would Find Prior Offenses Committed on Different “Occasions”, Oct. 15, 2025. Sixth Amendment, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Prior Conviction/Sentence/Incarceration, Blakely/Booker, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Conviction for First-Degree Aggravated Assault Does Not Require Physical Force so Is Not Qualifying Predicate for ACCA Purposes, Dec. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Three Strikes, Career Offenders, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Recidivist Enhancements.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Army Veteran Serving Life Without Parole for Taking $9, June 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Veterans, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
- Ninth Circuit: Proposition 47 Creates New, Intervening Judgment to Allow Another Federal Habeas Petition Attacking Entire Case, April 15, 2020. Three Strikes Statutes/Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.