U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
October 15, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Reasonable Suspicion.
In this case the Court addressed otherwise innocent activity in the context of reasonable suspicion, stating: "This Court is aware that under the totality of the circumstances test it is possible that "objective facts, meaningless to the untrained" can provide the basis for reasonable suspicion. However, some factors may …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Arena, No. 00 Cr. 398 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y.) (2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17522) (October 29, 2001) (Judge John F. Keenan)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-3129 (D.C. Cir.) (267 F.3d 1154) (October 30, 2001) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- Andrade v. Attorney General of California, No. 99-55691 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 743) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
- U.S. v. Shark, No. Crim. No. 92-0405-05 (JGP) (D.D.C.) (158 F.Supp.2d 43) (July 31, 2001) (Judge John Garrett Penn)
- U.S. v. Angwin, No. 00-50276 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 979) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Charles R. Breyer)
- Ortega v. U.S., No. 01-1168 (8th Cir.) (270 F.3d 540) (November 1, 2001) (Judge Donald R. Ross)
- U.S. v. Bjorkman, No. 99-3302 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 482) (October 30, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. K, No. 00-CR-951 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 421) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Markin, No. 99-3977 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 491) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- Tremper v. Ulster County Dept. of Probation, No. 01-CV-1125 (N.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 352) (August 22, 2001) (Judge David N. Hurd)
- U.S. v. Barragan, No. 00-30335 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 919) (August 29, 2001) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Ennenga, No. 00-1226 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 499) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Announces Long Vehicle Protective-Search Exception Requires Contemporaneous Facts Demonstrating Third Party’s Potential Dangerousness Before Warrantless Vehicle Search Is Permissible, March 1, 2026. Warrantless Searches, Exception to Warrant Requirement, Motions To Suppress, Searches - Automobile, Reasonable Suspicion.
- Supreme Court of Maryland Announces Police Officer’s Observation of Driver Manipulating Cellphone Screen Does Not, Without Additional Facts, Establish Reasonable Suspicion for Traffic Stop Under Fourth Amendment, Feb. 1, 2026. Cell-Phones, Motions To Suppress, Reasonable Suspicion, Traffic Stops, Terry Stops.
- California Court of Appeal: Wearing Puffy Jacket on Hot and Humid Night Does Not Constitute Reasonable Suspicion of Criminal Activity, Nov. 1, 2024. Reasonable Suspicion.
- Fourth Circuit: Evidence Suppressed Where Officers Seized Defendant Without Reasonable Suspicion and Forced Him to Prove He Was Not Armed, Nov. 1, 2023. Reasonable Suspicion, Arrest - Search Incident to, Suppression of Identity Evidence.
- New York Court of Appeals Suppresses Evidence Because Police Lacked Reasonable Suspicion Necessary for Level 3 Stop and Frisk Under De Bour Framework, Oct. 1, 2023. Frisks after an initial stop, Reasonable Suspicion, Suppression.
- Fourth Circuit Announces Payton’s ‘Reason to Believe’ Standard for Entering a Third-Party’s Home Based on Arrest Warrant for Suspect Amounts to Probable Cause Suspect Resides There, Jan. 15, 2021. Arrest Warrants, Reasonable Suspicion.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.