U.S. v. Angwin, No. 00-50276 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 979) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Charles R. Breyer)
The defendant in this case argued on appeal, inter alia, that the district court had erred by excluding testimony regarding his training and experience in the Coast Guard Auxiliary as habit evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 406. Rule 406 provides: "Evidence of the habit of a person or of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login