Skip navigation

U.S. v. Barragan, No. 00-30335 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 919) (August 29, 2001) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)

The defendant in this case argued that the district court plainly erred under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), by sentencing him to five years of supervised release because the jury made no finding regarding drug quantity. He contended ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login