Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bearden, No. 00-3898 (8th Cir.) (265 F.3d 732) (September 12, 2001) (Judge Cynthia Holcomb Hall)

This case is noted for one of those typically broad double jeopardy holdings that always seem to allow the government to pursue a successive prosecution on some technically different - but substantively virtually identical - grounds after the defendant has been acquitted the first time around. In this case, the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login