U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-3129 (D.C. Cir.) (267 F.3d 1154) (October 30, 2001) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
October 15, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Applicable Guidelines Issues.
The defendant in this case, a government employee in the District of Columbia, was accused of steering clients to a Medicaid facility in exchange for various benefits. He was convicted at trial of conflict of interest and conspiracy, under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. §§ 208(a) and 371. The jury, …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Arena, No. 00 Cr. 398 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y.) (2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17522) (October 29, 2001) (Judge John F. Keenan)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-3129 (D.C. Cir.) (267 F.3d 1154) (October 30, 2001) (Judge Harry T. Edwards)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 00-5177 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 571) (August 29, 2001) (Judge John D. Holschuh)
- Andrade v. Attorney General of California, No. 99-55691 (9th Cir.) (270 F.3d 743) (November 2, 2001) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
- U.S. v. Shark, No. Crim. No. 92-0405-05 (JGP) (D.D.C.) (158 F.Supp.2d 43) (July 31, 2001) (Judge John Garrett Penn)
- U.S. v. Angwin, No. 00-50276 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 979) (August 30, 2001) (Judge Charles R. Breyer)
- Ortega v. U.S., No. 01-1168 (8th Cir.) (270 F.3d 540) (November 1, 2001) (Judge Donald R. Ross)
- U.S. v. Bjorkman, No. 99-3302 (7th Cir.) (270 F.3d 482) (October 30, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. K, No. 00-CR-951 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 421) (May 31, 2001) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Markin, No. 99-3977 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 491) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
- Tremper v. Ulster County Dept. of Probation, No. 01-CV-1125 (N.D.N.Y.) (160 F.Supp.2d 352) (August 22, 2001) (Judge David N. Hurd)
- U.S. v. Barragan, No. 00-30335 (9th Cir.) (263 F.3d 919) (August 29, 2001) (Judge Arthur L. Alarcon)
- U.S. v. Ennenga, No. 00-1226 (6th Cir.) (263 F.3d 499) (August 17, 2001) (Judge Ronald Lee Gilman)
More from these topics:
- Fourth Circuit: A Finding of Offering Money to Minor for Videos Depicting Specific Conduct Without Establishing Order of Events Insufficient to Establish Offer ‘Caused’ Minor to Produce Explicit Material Within Meaning of Guidelines § 2G2.2(c)(1) Cros, July 1, 2025. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.