U.S. v. Titchell, No. 00-3193 (3rd Cir.) (261 F.3d 348) (August 16, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
September 24, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Burden of Proof.
Here the Court rejected a claim that Apprendi required that certain factors that affected the defendant's sentence for a mail fraud conviction had to be submitted to the jury since the ultimate sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum.
The defendant in this case was convicted of mail fraud, in ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Booker, No. 00-2609 (7th Cir.) (260 F.3d 820) (August 14, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 00-11491 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1267) (August 7, 2001) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 00-3624 (8th Cir.) (260 F.3d 965) (August 15, 2001) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. LeMay, No. 00-30193 (9th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1018) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- Herbst v. Cook, No. 99-35133 (9th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1039) (August 10, 2001) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Singleton, No. 99-14867 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1295) (August 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Nee, No. 00-2037 (1st Cir.) (261 F.3d 79) (August 20, 2001) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- Ford v. City of Boston, No. Civ. 98-11346-NG (D.Mass.) (154 F.Supp.2d 131) (July 31, 2001) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- Ruiz v. Johnson, No. CIV. A. H-78-987 (S.D.Tex.) (154 F.Supp.2d 975) (June 18, 2001) (William Wayne Justice)
- Murphy v. U.S., No. 01-1291 (8th Cir.) (268 F.3d 599) (October 12, 2001) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Vazquez, No. 99-3845 (3rd Cir.) (271 F.3d 93) (October 9, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Cotton, No. 99-4162 (4th Cir.) (261 F.3d 397) (August 10, 2001) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 00-2346 (6th Cir.) (268 F.3d 407) (October 10, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Titchell, No. 00-3193 (3rd Cir.) (261 F.3d 348) (August 16, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- Wilson v. Lawrence County, No. 00-2828 (8th Cir.) (260 F.3d 946) (August 15, 2001) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 00-11491 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1267) (August 7, 2001) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Coppa, No. 01-3031 (2nd Cir.) (267 F.3d 132) (October 5, 2001) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- Coalition for Gov. Procure. v. Fed. Pris., No. 1:99-CV-919 (W.D.Mich.) (154 F.Supp.2d 1140) (August 8, 2001) (Judge Robert Holmes Bell)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 1:00-CR-105-ALL (E.D.Tenn.) (154 F.Supp.2d 1336) (June 29, 2001) (Judge Curtis L. Collier)
More from these topics:
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- Seventh Circuit Vacates Sentence Because Government Failed to Meet Its Burden to Support Uncharged Drug Quantity Under Rule 32, Aug. 9, 2022. Burden of Proof, Drugs - Determination of.
- Colorado Supreme Court Announces ‘Reasonable Likelihood’ Framework for Determining Whether Trial Court’s Comments to Prospective Jurors Lowered Prosecution’s Burden of Proof, July 15, 2022. Jury Instructions in Jury Room, Burden of Proof, Improper Comment.
- South Carolina Supreme Court Rejects U.S. Supreme Court’s Shifting of Burden to Defendant to Prove Absence of Exigent Circumstances in DUI Cases, June 15, 2020. Exigent Circumstances, Warrantless Searches, Burden of Proof.
- Fifth Circuit Finds IAC for Failure to Object to Court’s Jury Instructions that Constructively Amended Indictment by Lowering Government’s Burden of Proof, May 15, 2020. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jurors and Juries, Burden of Proof.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.