U.S. v. Vazquez, No. 99-3845 (3rd Cir.) (271 F.3d 93) (October 9, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2001
published in Punch and Jurists
September 24, 2001
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
This en banc decision is principally noted for the dissenting opinions which argued that it was improper to judge Apprendi sentencing errors by the "seriously affecting fairness" standards of Johnson v. U.S. and Neder v. U.S.
The four separate opinions that comprise this lengthy en banc decision present …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 1:00-CR-105-ALL (E.D.Tenn.) (154 F.Supp.2d 1336) (June 29, 2001) (Judge Curtis L. Collier)
- Coalition for Gov. Procure. v. Fed. Pris., No. 1:99-CV-919 (W.D.Mich.) (154 F.Supp.2d 1140) (August 8, 2001) (Judge Robert Holmes Bell)
- U.S. v. Coppa, No. 01-3031 (2nd Cir.) (267 F.3d 132) (October 5, 2001) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 00-11491 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1267) (August 7, 2001) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- Wilson v. Lawrence County, No. 00-2828 (8th Cir.) (260 F.3d 946) (August 15, 2001) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Titchell, No. 00-3193 (3rd Cir.) (261 F.3d 348) (August 16, 2001) (Judge Marjorie O. Rendell)
- U.S. v. Garcia, No. 00-2346 (6th Cir.) (268 F.3d 407) (October 10, 2001) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Cotton, No. 99-4162 (4th Cir.) (261 F.3d 397) (August 10, 2001) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Vazquez, No. 99-3845 (3rd Cir.) (271 F.3d 93) (October 9, 2001) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- Murphy v. U.S., No. 01-1291 (8th Cir.) (268 F.3d 599) (October 12, 2001) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Ruiz v. Johnson, No. CIV. A. H-78-987 (S.D.Tex.) (154 F.Supp.2d 975) (June 18, 2001) (William Wayne Justice)
- Ford v. City of Boston, No. Civ. 98-11346-NG (D.Mass.) (154 F.Supp.2d 131) (July 31, 2001) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Nee, No. 00-2037 (1st Cir.) (261 F.3d 79) (August 20, 2001) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- U.S. v. Singleton, No. 99-14867 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1295) (August 8, 2001) (Per Curiam)
- Herbst v. Cook, No. 99-35133 (9th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1039) (August 10, 2001) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. LeMay, No. 00-30193 (9th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1018) (August 9, 2001) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 00-3624 (8th Cir.) (260 F.3d 965) (August 15, 2001) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
- U.S. v. Gray, No. 00-11491 (11th Cir.) (260 F.3d 1267) (August 7, 2001) (Judge Stanley Marcus)
- U.S. v. Booker, No. 00-2609 (7th Cir.) (260 F.3d 820) (August 14, 2001) (Judge William J. Bauer)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.