Duckett v. Mullin, No. 00-6292 (10th Cir.) (306 F.3d 982) (September 4, 2002) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
Although a district attorney's "inappropriate" commentary at trial was intentional and calculated, a habeas petitioner could not show that prosecutorial misconduct so infected the trial as to make the proceeding
fundamentally unfair.
This case is a farce. In 1988, the petitioner, Robert Don Duckett, was convicted of first-degree murder and ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login