U.S. v. Allen, No. 1:01-CR-80 (N.D.Ind.) (208 F.Supp.2d 984) (June 19, 2002) (Judge William C. Lee)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
August 19, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Daubert Standards.
Here, following its earlier ruling reported at 207 F.Supp.2d 856, the Court denied the defendant's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony regarding footwear impression evidence, holding that the methodology employed was sufficiently reliable.
The defendant was charged with bank burglary. In an earlier proceeding reported at 207 …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Thomas, No. 00-1593(L) (2nd Cir.) (303 F.3d 138) (September 4, 2002) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. O'Hara, No. 01-2950 (7th Cir.) (301 F.3d 563) (August 20, 2002) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- Milstein v. Cooley, No. CV 99-01054 DDP (AIJX) (C.D.Cal.) (208 F.Supp.2d 1116) (June 12, 2002) (Judge Dean D. Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Sayles, No. 00-4833 (4th Cir.) (296 F.3d 219) (July 10, 2002) (Judge Diana Gribbon Motz)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 01-10017 (5th Cir.) (296 F.3d 344) (June 26, 2002) (Judge Edith Brown Clement)
- U.S. v. Chase, No. 00-4803 (4th Cir.) (296 F.3d 247) (July 10, 2002) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- Mantilla v. U.S., No. 99-5923 (3rd Cir.) (302 F.3d 182) (September 3, 2002) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)
- U.S. v. Barnes, No. 01-3048 (D.C. Cir.) (295 F.3d 1354) (July 23, 2002) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. U.S. Currency in the Amount of $119.984, More or Less, No. 01-6077 (2nd Cir.) (304 F.3d 165) (September 5, 2002) (Judge Chester J. Straub)
- Henderson v. Walls, No. 00-3834 (7th Cir.) (296 F.3d 541) (July 9, 2002) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Allen, No. 1:01-CR-80 (N.D.Ind.) (208 F.Supp.2d 984) (June 19, 2002) (Judge William C. Lee)
- Duckett v. Mullin, No. 00-6292 (10th Cir.) (306 F.3d 982) (September 4, 2002) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
More from these topics:
- Maine Supreme Judicial Court Announces Trial Courts Must Rigorously Scrutinize Reliability of Expert Testimony in Unrecognized Forensic Fields, Holding Trial Court Erred in Admitting Forensic Podiatry Footprint-Comparison Testimony Without a Demonstrated, Feb. 1, 2026. Forensic Sciences, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony, Improper Comments.
- Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Framework for Evaluating Extraordinary Motions for New Trial Based on Scientific Developments, Holding Trial Court Applied Incorrect Legal Standard in Denying “Shaken Baby Syndrome” Challenge, Feb. 1, 2026. Forensic Sciences, New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony.
- When AI Invents the Pixels: Challenging AI-Enhanced Video Evidence in Criminal Cases, Dec. 15, 2025. Authentication/Identification, Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Writings, Recordings & Photographs, Daubert Standards, Scientific Testimony or Evidence.
- Generative Suspicion: What Defense Lawyers Must Know About AI-Generated Police Reports, Nov. 15, 2025. Evidence - Integrity/Reliability of, Daubert Standards, Witnesses - Examination of, Official Report, Brady/Giglio/Jencks Act Issues.
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Affirms Trial Court’s Exclusion of Expert Testimony on iPhone’s Frequent Location History Data as Not Sufficiently Reliable Under Daubert-Lanigan Standard, June 15, 2024. Cell Site Location Information ("CSLI"), Opinions and Expert Testimony, Daubert Standards.
- The Daniel Buffington Dilemma: Does His Expert Witness Testimony Satisfy Daubert?, Aug. 1, 2023. Death Penalty/Death Row, Daubert Standards, Expert and Opinion Testimony, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Announces Adoption of Daubert-Type Standard for Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Cases in Assessing Admissibility of Expert Evidence Under Rule 702, March 15, 2023. Daubert Standards.
- Seventh Circuit Affirms Use Of “Some Evidence” Standard in Reviewing Federal Prisoner’s Disciplinary Violations, Aug. 1, 2022. Disciplinary Hearings, Daubert Standards.
- Ninth Circuit Announces Panels of Court of Appeals May Fashion Remedy When District Court Commits Daubert Error, Dec. 15, 2020. Daubert Standards, Reliability of Evidence/Testimony.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.