U.S. v. Acosta, No. 01-2224 (1st Cir.) (303 F.3d 78) (August 30, 2002) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
August 12, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Exclusionary Rule.
The Court held that the exclusionary rule does not bar the use of evidence seized in violation of a defendant's 4th Amendment rights at sentencing; but left open the question whether such evidence may be used when the evidence is used intentionally.
In this case, the district court had ruled ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Ryan v. Miller, No. 01-2122 (2nd Cir.) (303 F.3d 231) (August 28, 2002) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- U.S. v. Allen, No. 1:01-CR-80 (N.D.Ind.) (207 F.Supp.2d 856) (June 10, 2002) (Judge William C. Lee)
- U.S. v. Mansoori, No. 99-1492 (7th Cir.) (304 F.3d 635) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Goldberg, No. 01-5052 (10th Cir.) (295 F.3d 1133) (July 9, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Collier v. Davis, No. 01-1742 (7th Cir.) (301 F.3d 843) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 01-50597 (9th Cir.) (300 F.3d 1166) (August 27, 2002) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
- U.S. v. Dalgado-Nunez, No. 01-50438 (5th Cir.) (295 F.3d 494) (June 20, 2002) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Campbell, No. 00-1698 (3rd Cir.) (295 F.3d 398) (July 2, 2002) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Stennett, No. CR. CCB-02-0124 (D.Md.) (208 F.Supp.2d 578) (July 3, 2002) (Judge Catherine C. Blake)
- Bailey v. Weber, No. 01-1550 (8th Cir.) (295 F.3d 852) (July 10, 2002) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Avery, No. 00-3262 (10th Cir.) (295 F.3d 1158) (July 9, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Truman, No. 01-5072 (6th Cir.) (304 F.3d 586) (August 29, 2002) (Judge David M. Lawson)
- U.S. v. Knox, No. 01-3000 (7th Cir.) (301 F.3d 616) (August 28, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Acosta, No. 01-2224 (1st Cir.) (303 F.3d 78) (August 30, 2002) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)
- U.S. v. Mansoori, No. 99-1492 (7th Cir.) (304 F.3d 635) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Randle, No. 97-20360 (5th Cir.) (304 F.3d 373) (August 26, 2002) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Faulkingham, No. 01-2276 (1st Cir.) (295 F.3d 85) (July 9, 2002) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- Thompson v. Davis, No. 01-15091 (9th Cir.) (295 F.3d 890) (July 3, 2002) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Oregon Parole Hearing Exclusion Rule Invalidated, Sept. 15, 2023. Parole Board Misconduct, Murder/Felony Murder, Exclusionary Rule, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release.
- Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies There Is No Per Se Rule Excluding Self-Serving Hearsay, Sept. 1, 2023. Pro Se Issues, Hearsay Evidence, Exclusionary Rule.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Good-Faith Exception to Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable to Warrant Based on Affidavit Stating Cellphones Found at Scene of Traffic Crash ‘May’ Contain Evidence, May 15, 2023. Traffic Stops, Good Faith Exception, Exclusionary Rule.
- California Supreme Court Announces Predicate Offenses for Gang Enhancement or Gang Participation Not Provable Using Expert Witness Testimony Without Personal Knowledge of Facts, Sept. 15, 2021. Opinions and Expert Testimony, Gang Membership, Exclusionary Rule.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.