U.S. v. Campbell, No. 00-1698 (3rd Cir.) (295 F.3d 398) (July 2, 2002) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
August 12, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Here the Court held that even though the defendant's 22-year sentence violated the Apprendi rule, the error did not affect the defendant's substantial rights nor seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.
Appellant was a criminal defendant convicted in the United States District …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Ryan v. Miller, No. 01-2122 (2nd Cir.) (303 F.3d 231) (August 28, 2002) (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler)
- U.S. v. Faulkingham, No. 01-2276 (1st Cir.) (295 F.3d 85) (July 9, 2002) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
- U.S. v. Randle, No. 97-20360 (5th Cir.) (304 F.3d 373) (August 26, 2002) (Judge Edith H. Jones)
- U.S. v. Mansoori, No. 99-1492 (7th Cir.) (304 F.3d 635) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Acosta, No. 01-2224 (1st Cir.) (303 F.3d 78) (August 30, 2002) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)
- U.S. v. Knox, No. 01-3000 (7th Cir.) (301 F.3d 616) (August 28, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Truman, No. 01-5072 (6th Cir.) (304 F.3d 586) (August 29, 2002) (Judge David M. Lawson)
- U.S. v. Avery, No. 00-3262 (10th Cir.) (295 F.3d 1158) (July 9, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- Thompson v. Davis, No. 01-15091 (9th Cir.) (295 F.3d 890) (July 3, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stennett, No. CR. CCB-02-0124 (D.Md.) (208 F.Supp.2d 578) (July 3, 2002) (Judge Catherine C. Blake)
- U.S. v. Campbell, No. 00-1698 (3rd Cir.) (295 F.3d 398) (July 2, 2002) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Dalgado-Nunez, No. 01-50438 (5th Cir.) (295 F.3d 494) (June 20, 2002) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 01-50597 (9th Cir.) (300 F.3d 1166) (August 27, 2002) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
- Collier v. Davis, No. 01-1742 (7th Cir.) (301 F.3d 843) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- U.S. v. Goldberg, No. 01-5052 (10th Cir.) (295 F.3d 1133) (July 9, 2002) (Judge David M. Ebel)
- U.S. v. Mansoori, No. 99-1492 (7th Cir.) (304 F.3d 635) (August 29, 2002) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Allen, No. 1:01-CR-80 (N.D.Ind.) (207 F.Supp.2d 856) (June 10, 2002) (Judge William C. Lee)
- Bailey v. Weber, No. 01-1550 (8th Cir.) (295 F.3d 852) (July 10, 2002) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.