U.S. v. Carter, No. 98-4912 (4th Cir.) (300 F.3d 415) (July 30, 2002) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 2002
published in Punch and Jurists
September 16, 2002
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Plain Error.
Here the Court held that plain Apprendi error in not submitting drug quantity to jury would not be noticed due to “overwhelming evidence” of drug quantities supporting sentences in excess of statutory maximums.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Hill v. Anderson, No. 99-4317 (6th Cir.) (300 F.3d 679) (August 13, 2002) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
- U.S. v. Nguyen, No. CR01-4069-MBW (N.D.Iowa) (212 F.Supp.2d 1008) (May 17, 2002) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- U.S. v. Mercado, No. 01-10507 (10th Cir.) (307 F.3d 1226) (October 4, 2002) (Judge Monroe G. McKay)
- U.S. v. Franklin, No. Crim. No. 99-238-01 (E.D.Pa.) (213 F.Supp.2d 478) (April 26, 2002) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen)
- U.S. v. Haqq, No. 00 Cr. 278(NRB) (S.D.N.Y.) (213 F.Supp.2d 383) (July 31, 2002) (Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald)
- U.S. v. Scolaro, No. 01-3365 (8th Cir.) (299 F.3d 956) (August 15, 2002) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- Rashad v. Walsh, No. 02-1422 (1st Cir.) (300 F.3d 27) (August 14, 2002) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Erwin, No. 01-5221 (10th Cir.) (299 F.3d 1230) (August 21, 2002) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- Ruggiano v. Reish, No. 01-3703 (3rd Cir.) (307 F.3d 121) (October 1, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Geston, No. 01-50081 (9th Cir.) (299 F.3d 1130) (August 13, 2002) (Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson)
- U.S. v. Ahlers, No. 01-2570 (1st Cir.) (305 F.3d 54) (September 30, 1992) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Ashcroft, No. 02-2524 (3rd Cir.) (308 F.3d 198) (October 8, 2002) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Carter, No. 98-4912 (4th Cir.) (300 F.3d 415) (July 30, 2002) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Louis, No. 01-1836 (1st Cir.) (300 F.3d 78) (August 20, 2002) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
More from these topics:
- Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses, March 1, 2026. Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, Qualifying Offenses, Plain Error, Elements of Offense, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range.
- New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial, March 1, 2026. Background Evidence, Prejudice - Potential for Undue, Bad Acts Evidence, Improper Comments, Plain Error.
- Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions, March 1, 2026. Waiver of Appeal Rights, Failure to Object, Revocation Proceedings, Conditions of, Plain Error.
- Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome, March 1, 2026. Preservation of Appellate Rights/Issues, Failure to Object, Hearsay Evidence, Confrontation Clause, Plain Error.
- First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, Not Specific Performance by District Court, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Recommend the Sentence Promised, Plain Error, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas, Acceptance/Rejection by the Court.
- First Circuit Announces It Has Authority to Raise Claim of Error Sua Sponte for Violation of ‘Mandate Rule’ by Sentenc-ing Court on Remand, Jan. 15, 2024. Mandate Rule, Sua Sponte Changes, Principle of Party Presentation, Plain Error, Miscalculation of the Guidelines Sentencing Range, Reduction of Sentence.
- Tenth Circuit: Unreasonable Determination of Downward Variance of Guidelines Resulted in Plain Error, Jan. 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Plain Error, Amendment/Variance.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.