Bugh v. Mitchell, No. 01-3417 (6th Cir.) (329 F.3d 496) (May 13, 2003) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
Loaded on April 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
April 21, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
This case is noted for its current and very comprehensive review of some of the critical Confrontation Clause issues involved in the field of child sex crime cases - one of the fastest growing categories of crimes in America. The petitioner in this case, Richard Bugh, was convicted in …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Cotto v. Herbert, No. 01-2694 (2nd Cir.) (331 F.3d 217) (May 1, 2003) (Judge Chester J. Straub)
- U.S. v. Alvarado, No. 02-1899 (7th Cir.) (326 F.3d 857) (April 9, 2003) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
- U.S. v. Alarcon-Garcia, No. 02-1549 (8th Cir.) (327 F.3d 719) (April 28, 2003) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Zapata, No. CIV.A. 96-CR-120-B-01 (D.Colo.) (245 F.Supp.2d 1165) (February 14, 2003) (Judge Lewis T. Babcock)
- U.S. v. Edwards, No. 02-2045 (10th Cir.) (325 F.3d 1184) (March 13, 2003) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- U.S. v. Sabri, No. 02-1561 (8th Cir.) (326 F.3d 937) (April 7, 2003) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- Bugh v. Mitchell, No. 01-3417 (6th Cir.) (329 F.3d 496) (May 13, 2003) (Judge R. Guy Jr. Cole)
- Ortiz v. McBride, No. 02-0088 (2nd Cir.) (323 F.3d 191) (March 21, 2003) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Arnett, No. 00-10170 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 845) (April 24, 2003) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Holds Sixth Amendment Requires Case-Specific Necessity Determination to Screen Child Witnesses, Rejecting Reliance on Mandatory State Statutes Based on Generalized Legislative Findings, Dec. 15, 2025. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Confrontation Clause.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Witness Wearing Surgical Mask During Pandemic Is Denial of Sixth Amendment Right to Face-to-Face Confrontation and No General Exception to This Right for Pandemic or ‘Other Global Events’ Such as Wars and Natural, Feb. 15, 2025. COVID-19, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Practitioner Exception.
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025. Habeas Corpus, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Exculpatory No Doctrine, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.