Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)

Loaded on Feb. 10, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists April 09, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In 1994, the Supreme Court addressed, in Custis v. U.S., 511 U.S. 485 (1994), whether a defendant, facing an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (18 U.S.C. ยง 924(e)) (ACCA), could collaterally attack the validity of the previous state convictions used to enhance his federal sentence. The Court ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  2. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, No. 99-1884 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 394; 121 S.Ct. 1567) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  3. U.S. v. Tarkoff, No. 99-13223 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 991) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)
  4. U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: