Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)

Loaded on Feb. 10, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists April 09, 2001
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In 1994, the Supreme Court addressed, in Custis v. U.S., 511 U.S. 485 (1994), whether a defendant, facing an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (18 U.S.C. § 924(e)) (ACCA), could collaterally attack the validity of the previous state convictions used to enhance his federal sentence. The Court …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Daniels v. U.S., No. 99-9136 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 374; 121 S.Ct. 1578) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  2. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss, No. 99-1884 (U.S. Supreme Court) (532 U.S. 394; 121 S.Ct. 1567) (April 25, 2001) (Justice O'Connor)
  3. U.S. v. Bradford, No. 99-3018 (8th Cir.) (246 F.3d 1107) (April 13, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Thomas, No. 98-1051 (2nd Cir.) (248 F.3d 76) (April 25, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Ardley, No. 98-7033 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 989) (February 20, 2001) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Tarkoff, No. 99-13223 (11th Cir.) (242 F.3d 991) (February 20, 2001) (Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch)

More from these topics: