Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Coleman v. U.S., No. 01-2236 (2nd Cir.) (329 F.3d 77) (May 7, 2003) (Judge Robert D. Sack)

Loaded on June 1, 2003 published in Punch and Jurists June 09, 2003
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In this case a divided panel from the Second Circuit held that the rule established in Apprendi does not apply retroactively to initial habeas corpus petitions - because while Apprendi "unquestionably announced a new rule of law," the new rule that Apprendi established was procedural in nature - and most ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Coleman v. U.S., No. 01-2236 (2nd Cir.) (329 F.3d 77) (May 7, 2003) (Judge Robert D. Sack)
  2. U.S. v. Andis, No. 01-1272 (8th Cir.) (333 F.3d 886) (June 27, 2003) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
  3. U.S. v. Moussaoui, No. 03-4162 (4th Cir.) (333 F.3d 509) (June 26, 2003) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
  4. U.S. v. Swinton, No. 01-1004 (3rd Cir.) (333 F.3d 481) (June 23, 2003) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
  5. U.S. v. Villalobos, No. 01-30066 (9th Cir.) (333 F.3d 1070) (June 27, 2003) (Judge James R. Browning)
  6. U.S. v. Camejo, No. 01-1572 (6th Cir.) (333 F.3d 669) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Joseph M. Hood)
  7. U.S. v. Shimoda, No. 02-10188 (9th Cir.) (334 F.3d 846) (June 26, 2003) (Judge Edward Leavy)
  8. U.S. v. Bennett, No. 02-3176 (7th Cir.) (332 F.3d 1094) (June 23, 2003) (Judge William J. Bauer)
  9. U.S. v. $242,484.00, No. 01-16485 (11th Cir.) (351 F.3d 499) (June 30, 2003) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)

More from these topics: